My first impressions of the watch were that it certainly looks a lot nicer than my 405, time has obviously been spent trying to create a stylish watch perhaps people will wear casually. However, it is pretty chunky which is understandable considering what is in it. The box had limited instructions but that seems common now with tech – enough guidance to get you online and to read more.

Technically you could just go out for a run without syncing the watch – however, most of the watch settings are configured through the Nike connect app so it’s wise to be ‘online’ with this watch. It seems unlike the Garmin counterpart this watch has very little it can do without being online, to it’s defence the Garmin offline tool is pretty pants but i’m sure useful to some (and there are paid for offline tools too). Odd things are configured on the computer and not the watch, most peculiar was watch sounds. In my opinion that is something which belongs in a settings option on device?

I already have a Nike account so can’t run through that process, when I did it many years ago it was simple so I assume it still will be! After plugging the phone in (unhiding the USB connector in the strap) the watch talked with the Nike site and seemed happy to connect. Once fully charged it was time for a run…!

As I’m on the recovery stages following the marathon so far the distances run with it have been relatively short. The watch is pretty damn easy to use there is no denying that. With only 4 menu options; clock, run, history and records, it’s pretty difficult to get lost! Selecting ‘run’ presents you with more options determining whether you will be using the shoepod (which is supplied – one up on the Garmin), heart rate monitor or GPS – chose what you want and that’s it away you go!

As I mentioned earlier, when running there is very little displayed, given the size of the screen I would have expected a better use of display to at least give the option of more information. For me if running with a HRM, I like to see, at minimum, time elapsed, distance and heart rate. I would also like to see average pace just so I don’t have to do maths in my head as I run. From what I can tell on this device I have the option of 2 blocks of information, everything else I can get to via the buttons but requires fiddling whilst running, never good!

After finishing the run and connecting it to the computer via the USB device, which I found a bit odd and dated – I would have expected Bluetooth sync or something similar! I checked the online site. I hoped Nike had done a bit of work online since I last visited, the site used to be pretty cool, a visual masterpiece, clean and simple. All good apart from the last point, why have a complex device but only present information in a basic way? Fortunately, tucked away was a button that said Nike+ Beta, now this was better! Much more granular information displayed but still well designed. Nike have obviously spent a lot of time and money on this site and it has been worth it.

The whole process from start to finish was seamless and very easy. This watch is perfect for the casual runner due to it’s simple interface. However, there is one thing that let’s it down, the cost. If this device had come in at around the £100 mark I think I would have been happy to recommend it (as I do the Garmin 305′s) however at nearly £200 it seems a bit pricey. Especially considering the Nike+ app for the iPhone is about £2 and I would expect the target audience to be the same? As I don’t have a 4g iPhone I haven’t compared the watch and the app but I would expect the results to be very similar!

I’m still really surprised by the decision to make these, they are pretty much solely for runners so no good for cyclists or triathletes and by the time you have added £50 for a heart rate monitor it competes with the likes of Timex, Garmin and Polar of which I suspect all of the later are more useful especially for multi disciplines. I always expected a Nike+ watch would come but not with a GPS built in. I wanted and hoped for a simple and small device which could interface with the iPhone app providing readouts from that, I suspect if such a device could be created it would be cheaper too!

I will reserve final judgement until next week following the 10k. Ultimately if the watch is 100% accurate then regardless of my thoughts on it’s look or functionality, the watch does what it needs to do!

Initial verdict Garmin 405 (£182.08) vs Nike+ (£189), Garmin 405 wins, however for beginners and those on a budget the 305 (£116.12) trumps the lot of them hands down. Come back next week for a distance review!

One of my colleagues friends got in touch with me a few weeks back to tell me about some gloves he was selling – the ‘eglove‘. He informed me that due to the membrane in the finger* you can leave the gloves on and use the phone. I was a little dubious about this having picked up some Hilly Gloves at the Running Show following a recommendation that these would also work the same, and they didn’t!

Gloves on I went for a run. No-one rung me, same again next time. The gloves were keeping my hands warm but weren’t being tested when it came to the ‘e’ part and the unique selling point!

Eventually realising no one was going to call me I decided I would get out my phone and change the music, after all after 13miles of listening to ‘We are the Champions’ starts to get a bit dull. Oh my god they only bloody worked! Full access to my phone gloves still on, bingo!

Great piece of kit and I’m sure suitable for almost any runner. I know north face offer a similar glove but I haven’t tried these. However, I genuinely can’t fault the eglove for it’s handiness (no pun intended). Apparently they are also selling ski gloves with the same fingertip technology which would be cool (although any father ted viewer knows never to pick up a call whilst skiing!) as I remember having the same issues on the slopes last year!

Click for more information on egloves

On first impressions I was surprised how heavy the phone felt given its size. It looked like it should be quite light! It also didn’t look like a typical smart phones and it certainly wasn’t to my taste. The aluminium effect seems a little dated now! That said I didn’t really care too much what was on the outside it was more about what was under the hood!

Firing it up I was presented the Symbian OS which was very alien to me. I wanted to download Sports-tracker one of the few apps available for runners on Nokia phones. However, this was not going to be a simple task as it is on iPhone and Android OS. Firstly where is the App store or Market place?! After digging a bit I found it in the ‘ovi store’ – jackpot! Find app, click install, let’s go for a run! Sadly not, didn’t install – try again, didn’t install this pattern went on repeatedly until I was close to sending it back untested.

Eventually I went on the sports tracker website and sent the phone a link to the app, the ovi app opened again and it appeared I was in the same place again. One more try I thought – and for some reason this time it installed and worked. On sunday it would join me on my long run. I downloaded the most recent MT podcast onto it – using the really poor Nokia web browser (why is it so poor still!?!), charged it up and come Sunday morning it was in my pocket joining me on 14 miles to the Olympic stadium.

At Stratford I took it out and took some snaps on the camera which was relatively seamless and all the while the running app sat in the background logging data.

When I got home I compared my watch with the phone and (in this case) credit where credit is due the two were in 1/100 of a mile difference. Not bad I thought. Ignoring the initial ‘teething’ issues the phone had done well and I was prepared to box it up and send it back.

Unfortunately for the Nokia and Sports Tracker I didn’t get round to sending it back so queued it up with some music and used it on my Tuesday Morning run into work. This time the results were poor and very very unreliable. The 8miles my gamin logged where dwarfed by the sports trackers 9.11m, however i knew which one was more reliable! When I logged onto the Nokia site it transpires I did some swimming in the Thames which I didn’t realise!

This got me thinking about the other phones I had used and the consistency of data. Fortunately with both the Nokia and Moto I had ran upto stratford due to luck more than good testing plans. I believe both were pretty accurate in these runs but less so on runs that were in a busier area. I always assumed it was due to high buildings and losing signal which causes the differences but looking at my little swim along the Thames I wonder whether it maybe something else. Purely speculating and based on no fact I wonder whether these apps work really well when plotting on a ‘road’ rather than a path or trail. The software can build in logic if each point sits on a road on it’s map as it can be a lot more precise in it’s calculations, possibly!

Whilst I deliberate and ponder in my head I suspect it still is to do with building coverage. In somewhere like central London where there are lots of tall buildings it would make sense for the app to lose signal from the satellites and the less points it can plot the less accurate the reading will be.

So at the end of all that highly scientific waffling would I go out and get this phone. Unfortunately not, I wasnt a fan of the OS, didn’t like it’s appearance too much and the sports-tracker app results left a lot to be desired!!

Once again thanks to Vodafone for supplying me with this phone to play with! Hopefully a blackberry next thus completing the range of major smartphone OS’es.

To compare the runs here is the Sports Tracker Link and the Garmin Connect Link for the same route.

Branded as ‘rugged and waterproof’ this Android phone seemed the perfect phone for British weather and also a sweaty runner like yours truly! Charged and armed with a couple of running apps over the last few weeks I have seen it through its paces. I added both the Endemodo and Runkeeper apps and tried them over various runs and scenarios – I also threw on a few tracks to listen to whilst running – albeit a very very limited collection (including the classic blast from the past We Built this City).

I love the fact that I didn’t have to worry about getting this phone wet or damp so I chucked it into my pocket or held it whilst running.  Basically,  I just went for it and hoped it would indeed live up to its ‘rugged’ reputation – which it did!

The screen is the same size as my iPhone and the quality much sharper (just to remind you I have the very dated 3g model, not the 4). The phone is MUCH smaller and lighter than most phones that run android or iOS.  It was barely bigger than my old nano and the phone could obviously take the task of a phone (shocker!), music player, camera and GPS and running distance application.

What was the verdict of the running apps?

As I mentioned earlier one of the first things I did when I got the phone was to load on some different apps. I’ll be the first to admit that my knowledge of what was available for the Android operating system was very limited having only really looked at apps for my iPhone. However, it didn’t take too long to find out that both endemondo and runkeeper both offered versions for this phone and away I went.

Anyone who follows this blog regularly will know that I would never go out without my Garmin so I have been able to compare the app data with what my watch displayed and on the whole the results are pretty respectable coming in very close in distance to the GPS watch data.

What has to be constantly remembered though is these apps are TOTALLY free, unlike my very expensive Garmin. The phone will also give me a map to see me home when I get lost whereas the best my watch can do is give me a compass. This phone has much, much more functionality than the watch!!

I loved this phone, so much so I would seriously consider it for my next purchase over the iPhone. The size, coupled by its relative price, replaceable battery, durability and great screen resolution makes this phone actually pretty smart. Plus its substantially cheaper than its Apple rival! If you are a runner and want a phone to match your lifestyle without worrying about damaging it then this is the one for you! I know a lot of people run with their iPhones or similar phones by wrapping them in a sandwich bag or equivalent but this is not necessary with this phone meaning you can actually use it when you need to without the added hassle! As one of those people who have tried the sarny bag method in the pouring rain it was a refreshing change not to have to do it with this phone!

Go get this phone it rocks! Cheers Vodafone for sending it out to me, you may have just got a customer out of it too!!

Nike already have a MASSIVE community of runners who used its devices on Apple products. They have had the benefit of creating very slick interfaces which work in perfect harmony with the Apple ethos.

The Nike+ SportWatch GPS is designed to be simple and intuitive with only three buttons and a Tap Screen for navigation. During the run, the new Nike+ SportWatch GPS captures location information while showing runners their time, distance, pace, and calories burned on an easy-to-read screen featuring a customizable layout. Throughout the run, the GPS receiver works in tandem with the shoe-based Nike+ Sensor to deliver highly accurate pace and distance data. This sounds much like the Garmin Footpod/GPS model but typically the other systems increase the price to have the extra footpod setup. The benefit of the footpod is that sometimes you have to run in a gym or out of satellite range – this way wherever you go you get readings!

The features seem vary similar to all other devices, heart rate monitor, backlight, history. What I’m hopeful is that some time has been spent on the user experience which is something that I often think that my garmin struggles with. The touch screen feature will be interesting to see when my hands become sweaty or are in gloves!

If I’m totally honest I wasn’t expecting Nike to release a fully fledged GPS watch, I have had a few conversations in the past how I had expected them to create a simple watch that hooks into Smart Phones (iphones/androids etc) hence using the phones GPS receiver and processing power but giving the runner the extended information in an easy to read fashion. I would have thought this would be relatively cheap to create vs what they have outputted.

It will be interesting to see how well this does in the market. Nike/Tom Tom are entering a very competitive arena and from the press info I have I’m not sure its going to be suitable for tri-athletes, no mention of waterproof,  so really is a tool for the runners of which how many will give up there £1.99 Nike+ GPS app for something that is likely to be over £100 (realistically nearer £200 I’d have expected).

Regardless of the negatives I’m very interested to see what Nike/TomTom bring to the field!

I have said a number of times my major reservation as to why I don’t take my iPhone out is the fear of water damage be it rain, snow or most likely sweat. The phone is not a cheap device and to break it whilst running would set me back a few pennies and great annoyance. I have lost one (albeit cheap) phone at the marathon where my body overcooked and the sweat destroyed it. The defy however suggests my phone will be safe and tonight I took it out for a run.

I loaded up endomondo to see how good it was as a gps device and ran. Unfortunately it wasn’t an overly fair test, I let the phone off this time. It wasn’t raining or snowing and as I didn’t have any pockets I held onto it so it kept away from most moisture. During my next long run I will shove some audio on it, put it in my pocket and leave it. Hopefully a couple of hours later I will finish and it all be functioning as normal *hopefully*.

This is never going to be a fully fledged review of the defy – I’m sure you can find that elsewhere I just want to see if they are the perfect running device- Music/Phone/GPS/Smartphone everything you could need surely. I also noticed in endomondo a sync with Bluetooth HeartRateMonitor, not sure who supply those as I think both polar and gamin use proprietary transmission mechanisms.

Next time this puppy gets further testing and hopefully (for the phone testing part) it will rain!

Action Shot

I say nothing, that is technically a lie – a while back I got sent a copy of Just Dance 2 for the Wii to play and review, I guess it relates to the fitness side of the blog which I rarely focus on. It has been on my side waiting for an opportune moment to come and on Sunday afternoon it happened. Anyone who knows me well will be aware that I am a legend on the dance floor and this game is a little bit beneath my ability. Strutting my stuff around the living room to all of the best tunes ranging from Avril to Britney through to the Monster Mash (rather apt as it was Halloween). I’m pretty certain my dance coach would be well chuffed at my ability to hit perfect almost all of the time, he will be ringing me any time soon to add me to the Justin Timberlake backing crew I’m sure.

Anyway, if you have made it to now I’d like to think you have seen through my sarcasm, when it comes to dance I have two left feet and have learnt all my moves from the movie Hitch (make the pizza, chalk the snooker cue etc). Actually that’s a lie, that insinuated I would actually get up to dance in the first place, which I wouldn’t. However, I did play this game and when in ‘duet’ mode with Laura it was actually quite good fun even if she clearly tried a lot more than me (apparently you are supposed to move your legs even if the Wii doesn’t know this!) I can also see how it would be quite good for keeping fit. On a couple of dances, even with my limited ability, I was breaking a sweat. Most of my Wii games get played and go back into the draw. I think this one will be out for Xmas Day 2010 in all its glory – that gives me about 50 days to get good at it

Anyways, think I’ll stick to running in the future, I *think* I’m a little bit better at that!

Last night I was both fortunate (and in the last 5 minutes unfortunate!) enough to get a leg massage from Chris Domoney of the Sports Clinic Bluewater. Two years ago when I ran The London Marathon for Fairhavens we were introduced at the initial ‘pasta party’. Fortunately for me whilst he helped out in Southend he has a much more local setup in Kent. Chris is a top bloke and tends not to mince his words, if there is any issues he will send you onto Paul the Physio. I have yet to hear any negativity about either. Quite often Physios/Masseurs are quick to take your money but may not be specific enough to your needs or worse still be scaremongering. After-all if they aren’t involved in running they will often miss-advise or suggest to give up running entirely. Chris is a runner, if you head to his clinic you will see medals and numbers from marathons all around the world including all 5 majors (inspirational in itself…Chris I will have my own display like that one day!). Fortunately, I haven’t needed to see Paul the Physio but have close relations that have and have come back with glowing reviews – these chaps aren’t out there to rob you and if you treat them with the respect they deserve I’m sure the treatment will be top notch.

I hadn’t intended on this blog post being an advertisement for Chris but every so often it’s worth shouting out to the people who have helped out along the way. If you have used either Chris or Paul in the past why not write a quick comment or review below – I’m sure they will appreciate it! If you want to get in touch with either of them see info below (copied from elsewhere):

Chris works privately in Essex as well as having clinics in Surrey and Kent. He is on hand to reply to any running,dietary or general fitness enquiries being an Athletics coach and experienced personal trainer. If you would like to get in touch with Chris you can contact him on 07739 765587.

Paul Smith is a Physiotherapist and can be contacted on 07989 282237.

Thats all for now, till next week!

Without much thought I suspect for the beginner runner this is a definite ‘Yes’, the Gamin/Timex watches are typically expensive pieces of kit. If you don’t know someone that has one I think you could easily not know about them or be put off by the cost and ‘scare’ factor. Whilst Garmin is a big brand it is nowhere near that of Nike and as I sit writing this post I know that almost 1 in 4 of the people I know has an iPhone or Android based phone meaning they can pick up a competitive app for practically nothing.

I have reviewed the Nike+ and Adidas miCoach apps previously on this blog and both offer a great foundation for the runner at a maximum price of £2, or so you initially think. Since getting my iPhone many years ago it has barely left my side, it allows me to stay connected on the go, check emails and write blog posts! Now it could come out for a run with me, but it doesn’t – why not? Even my 2 year old phone is worth a couple of hundred pounds and replacing it would cost more like £500. I wouldn’t dream of putting a laptop in my back pocket whilst running (ignoring the logistics of course!) and my phone is just that. I am a big sweater and also I’m not just a fair-weather runner, when it’s raining I can still be found running and I’ve yet to be presented with a casing I trust in rain, snow and sweat conditions. I know for a fact, even though the iPhone maybe preloaded with Nike+ you will get little help if your phone dies due to water damage! The other big thing is the iPhone isn’t the smallest piece of kit and logically it can’t sit in a useful place to see statistics. Some apps have integrated a voice split indicator, very useful but it’s not available when you instantly want to see it. Come mid run (and I have witnessed this) it’s amusing to see people fumbling around hoping to hit buttons on their arm before giving up, detaching the phone playing then reattaching the device.

What I have to constantly remind myself is I am biased, I have already gone out and got an expensive Garmin so can’t really compare. If I didn’t have the watch and was starting running today I think there is a good chance I wouldn’t have bought one. Finding it difficult to justify the expense possibly opting for an app and making do with my old Polar Heart Rate monitor. I would accept a level of inaccuracy but wouldn’t know any different and I suspect by now I would have upgraded my phone just for this reason. However, which app would I be using? I think that’s for a separate ‘to follow’ post as otherwise once again this post maybe of dissertation length.

I would love to run a test on new runners to find out how people use these apps, I suspect that on the whole Nike will have got it spot on with it’s simplicity for new runners but fails to be of much use to those who need to dig a bit deeper into the data, it provides an app to use on the phone but not online. The adidas unique selling point is the coaching partner but how many people will bother with that – especially when the app is free! If you had to pay for the app it would possibly have a similar effect as paying for a gym in forcing you through financial guilt? The app I played with today (review to follow) seemed much more tailored to people who used Garmins. The website had lots of graphs, stats and information, the developers are clearly thinking for the future by offering API’s, widgets etc (something Garmin still lacks) stuff a coach or dedicated runner can analyse when they return from a run.

Would I stop using my Garmin? Not yet, I can be reasonably careless with it (although i shouldn’t as it is easy to forget how much it is worth!), it can take my heart rate and most importantly I can look at it easily whilst running. I can set up screens to show all the information I would ever need and by just lifting my arm I get these figures. Simples

N

Martin Yelling is husband of British Olympian Liz Yelling. He is a coach and is very very passionate about running and getting people into running. To add to the YellingGlobalRunningDomination™ he has added an Audiofuel Interval training design to his arsenal.

Following the same principle as the other audiofuel tracks the bpm derives your footfall and by adjusting this value it’s possible to simulate faster running. It adopts the same concepts as a Spin session at the gym. Martin has introduced his ideal 3 minute pyramid session. The track I have hits 180bpm but pyramids from 160->170->180 TWICE. Talking the runner through the session with verbal hints it forces you to push on where possibly you would give up.

I highlighted the word twice during the previous paragraph as when I did it, it was the second time that pushed me hard. Giving all I had in the fastest 3mins at 180bpm I only had 3 minutes to recover and go round over again – this time knowing exactly what to expect!

18 minutes later I was jogging back to the flat, exhausted and covered in sweat. I didn’t really fancy going out for a run beforehand but when I returned I was buzzing and I had only been out for a relatively short time!

Love these audiofuel tracks, they are great for individual training as I tend to get bored of my standard playlists and these offer a unique edge to what you would expect. Can’t wait to get my hands on the hardest bpm track although will make sure the hospital is on speed dial on my phone before going out on that one!!

Rock on with the next track AF, or maybe I should just stick to the current ones a few more times!

N